Week 7 -- Dostoevsky
Reason vs. Logic
I like the group’s definition of this difference mostly
because it’s a better version of my own definition. Logic in a way is the
strict tools of how you set up a problem, what you look at in a problem, and
how you pick a problem. If logic is the how, however, then reason would be the
why. Why you set up the problem in that way, why you looked at what you looked
at, etc. etc. 
Free Will Thru Revolt
I think you could make a comparison here between the
Underground Man and Meursault in The Stranger – in the end, they both revolted
against the social norms by doing things with which we cannot understand since
we were not in their position. I feel as though I can empathize with these
characters solely because I can appreciate how high they hold their own values,
even if their values are not exactly something I personally can understand.
Taking the Easy Way
Out
Alright, I admit it. I’m a business major. I take GPA
Boosters. I don’t take GPA Boosting classes because I don’t care about
learning, however; in fact, its quite the opposite. If GPA is a statistic my
employer looks at, and I take hard classes that I enjoy, which lowers my GPA,
it ends up harming me in the end, as it makes a statistic on my resume look
worse than the actual value of it is. So, rather, I study relatively “difficult”
concepts outside of the classroom, since it helps hedge against the lowering of
GPA. Taking it back to the topic, I feel sometimes that “taking the easy way
out” is a strategic decision rather than one made out of pure laziness.
Free Will vs. God
Taking Control
Perhaps this is not the most appropriate analogy, but when I
heard this the most immediate thing that came to my mind is capitalism versus
communism. Stay with me here; in a capitalist economy, you have more of an
ability to reach higher, gain more wealth, and create a name, but at the same
time you can fall lower, as well as be stunted by those who did reach wealth
before you. In communism (at least on paper), everyone is at the same level,
which is hopefully relatively good. The problem here however does not arise
that people cannot become poor, but rather people cannot become rich. With this
in mind, I feel like we have a similar set of pros and cons for free will and
god’s control: in free will, we have more ability to do what we want even
though this could lead to a greater detriment, however if jesus takes the wheel
then we can’t necessarily reach the top of our potential as that would mean
that others would have to do worse than us.
Purpose of Religion
I definitely believe the purpose of religion is multifaceted,
and can have both its strengths and its weaknesses. As I believe I’ve addressed
in a previous blogpost, I think people find closure and solace in the idea of
God, and that is how it finds its way into the heart of people. I also believe
that, when approached correctly, organized religion can have strengths as well –
the most notable strength of organized religion is that it fosters community.
Many people’s circle of friends are almost if not all fellow members of their
church. However, at the same time, there are some obvious weak points in this;
when people become to reliant on religion, and on god, they can become weaker
and more mendable to the will of the church and of others who claim to have a
deeper connection with god than them themselves. 
Comments
Post a Comment